<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Internet Search Engine Baidu.com Gets Sued In The USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/06/11/6867-chinese-internet-search-engine-baiducom-gets-sued-in-the-usa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/06/11/6867-chinese-internet-search-engine-baiducom-gets-sued-in-the-usa</link>
	<description>The Technology Source for the Latest Chinese News on Internet, Computers, Digital, Science, Electronics, Law, Security, Software, Web 2.0, Telecom, and Wireless Industries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turtlewind</title>
		<link>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/06/11/6867-chinese-internet-search-engine-baiducom-gets-sued-in-the-usa#comment-12483</link>
		<dc:creator>Turtlewind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinatechnews.com/?p=6867#comment-12483</guid>
		<description>5fad has already brought five separate cases against Baidu in China with the same allegations, and has lost all of them. The case is basically about deep linking; Baidu&#039;s MP3 search returns links to files stored on 5fad. I guess they think it&#039;s easier to launch baseless lawsuits than set up some actual security on their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5fad has already brought five separate cases against Baidu in China with the same allegations, and has lost all of them. The case is basically about deep linking; Baidu's MP3 search returns links to files stored on 5fad. I guess they think it's easier to launch baseless lawsuits than set up some actual security on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

