<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChinaTechNews.com &#187; Beijing Haidian District Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinatechnews.com/tag/beijing-haidian-district-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinatechnews.com</link>
	<description>The Technology Source for the Latest Chinese News on Internet, Computers, Digital, Science, Electronics, Law, Security, Software, Web 2.0, Telecom, and Wireless Industries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CCTV Sues Online Video Service Providers</title>
		<link>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2009/07/27/10213-cctv-sues-online-video-service-providers</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2009/07/27/10213-cctv-sues-online-video-service-providers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChinaTechNews.com Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.cn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeeboo.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing Haidian District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ku6.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soap opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-generated content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinatechnews.com/?p=10213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China International Television Corporation, an affiliate of CCTV, is using the Chinese courts to fight six online video service providers, including ku6.com, 6.cn and aeeboo.com. Beijing's Haidian District Court has already issued a preliminary order and judgement that the online video service providers had violated the rights of CCTV and has asked them to stop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2009/07/27/10213-cctv-sues-online-video-service-providers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Accused Of Adopting Dual Standards For IPR Protection In China</title>
		<link>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/05/23/6781-oracle-accused-of-adopting-dual-standards-for-ipr-protection-in-china</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/05/23/6781-oracle-accused-of-adopting-dual-standards-for-ipr-protection-in-china#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChinaTechNews.com Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing Haidian District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haidian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PetroChina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinatechnews.com/?p=6781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beijing Jiahua Chuangxin Technology Co., Ltd, a designated distributor of Oracle (ORCL) China, has filed a lawsuit against Oracle China, accusing the company of adopting dual standards in intellectual property rights protection in China. Oracle reportedly issued two letters of authorization to BJCTCL in December 2005 and March 2006, respectively, designating the latter as a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/05/23/6781-oracle-accused-of-adopting-dual-standards-for-ipr-protection-in-china/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

