For a man who had built one of the world's most powerful technology companies, Jensen Huang's influence in Washington had become almost as significant as his dominance in the artificial intelligence industry.

The Nvidia chief executive had secured direct access to US President Donald Trump, persuaded him to approve sales of advanced AI chips to China and emerged as an influential voice in a debate that has divided Washington: whether American technology should be kept out of Beijing's reach or used to maintain its dependence on US companies.

But Huang's proximity to Trump had also made him a target.

Behind the controversy that eventually culminated in his resignation as Nvidia chief executive was a prolonged struggle between the technology industry and a group of China hawks who believed Huang had too much influence over the president's approach to Beijing.

And as The Washington Post reported, some officials in Trump's administration were not merely uncomfortable with that influence. They wanted it gone.

“They wanted to destroy the influence Jensen had over the president,” a former official who worked on chip policy told the newspaper, speaking on condition of anonymity to describe internal dynamics.

That remark offers a glimpse into the political battle that unfolded around Huang.

His position on chip exports had increasingly put him at odds with national security officials, lawmakers and policy experts who viewed China's access to advanced American technology as a strategic threat.

A CORPORATE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AT THE CENTRE OF WASHINGTON'S CHINA DEBATE

Huang had argued that allowing American chipmakers to continue selling to China would ultimately benefit the United States. His reasoning was that keeping Chinese companies dependent on American technology would be preferable to forcing them to develop alternatives.

China hawks, however, saw the issue differently. They regarded Nvidia's advanced chips as critical assets in the growing technological and military competition between Washington and Beijing.

Allowing China access to them, they argued, could strengthen a strategic rival.

The disagreement became particularly consequential after Trump moved to approve the sale of certain Nvidia chips to China in exchange for a share of the revenue.

Huang's direct engagement with the president was seen as instrumental in securing the decision.

In December 2025, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described the arrangement as the result of a conversation between two influential figures.

“So it's the great American technologist talking to the great businessman president, and they reached what they thought was the right answer for this particular moment,” Lutnick told CNBC.

But not everyone in the administration agreed with that approach.

According to two former officials cited by The Washington Post, some national security officials resented the access Huang enjoyed and the influence he appeared to wield over Trump's decisions.

One former official compared the situation to handing officials a “nuclear bomb”, describing the concerns surrounding Huang's relationship with the president.

RUBIO'S MEMO AND THE INTELLIGENCE WARNING

The tensions took a new turn when Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio intervened over Huang's relationship with a Chinese businesswoman who was suspected by US intelligence officials of having links to Chinese intelligence.

According to The Washington Post, Rubio issued a memo warning Trump about the relationship, drawing on a report prepared by the CIA.

A person familiar with the matter told that Rubio recast the agency's findings in more assertive terms while preparing his own memo.

The findings were subsequently leaked to the media, bringing Huang's personal relationship and its potential national security implications into the public domain.

Huang later acknowledged having an affair with an executive at an Nvidia customer and apologised.

Nvidia's board opened an investigation into whether the relationship had compromised the company's security, although it initially said it continued to have confidence in his leadership.

The controversy deepened after reports emerged of another affair, this time involving an Nvidia subordinate.

The board then met to discuss Huang's future, and he resigned as chief executive on Thursday.

The Washington Post's account places Rubio's intervention within a much wider political contest over who gets to shape Trump's China policy.

Huang's departure, in that sense, was not simply a corporate leadership change. It removed one of the most prominent industry voices arguing against tighter restrictions on chip exports to China.

CHINA HAWKS SEE AN OPENING

For years, Huang had pushed back against calls in Washington to impose stricter controls on the sale of advanced chips to China.

His opponents included officials from both political parties, lawmakers and analysts at Washington think tanks.

They now see an opportunity to advance proposals that had previously faced resistance from the technology industry.

In Congress, lawmakers are seeking to add new restrictions on China's access to advanced chips to a major defence bill expected to be considered before the end of the year.

The proposals include tighter controls on exports of powerful AI chips, technology to detect chip smuggling and restrictions on China's access to equipment used in chip manufacturing.

Representative John Moolenaar, a Republican from Michigan who chairs the House Select Committee on China, said the US should ensure that American technology companies prioritise national security.

“Jensen Huang's firing from the company he founded is an unfortunate end that could have been avoided,” Moolenaar said.

He added that American companies should not put national security at risk by giving Chinese companies access to their most advanced chips.

Senator Jim Banks of Indiana also called for Congress to close loopholes that have enabled the movement of restricted chips through smuggling, shell buyers and remote access.

The push is not limited to Republicans. Sponsors of several proposed measures believe Huang's exit could make it easier to move legislation forward.

A Senate Democratic aide told The Washington Post that lawmakers had previously been waiting to see which Nvidia representatives would lobby against the proposals.

“Now all this stuff has come out, it puts them in a very, very tough position,” the aide said.

Ryan Fedasiuk, a senior fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation and a longtime supporter of chip export controls, said Huang had played a major personal role in promoting Nvidia's position in Washington.

“Things are forever changed,” he said.

A CHANGED EQUATION FOR TRUMP

Trump, who had developed a close relationship with Huang since they first met in 2025, publicly stood by the Nvidia chief even as the controversy gathered pace.

After Huang's resignation, the president described him as a “legend” who had “done a fantastic job."

Rubio, meanwhile, declined several times to discuss his role in alerting the White House to Huang's relationship when questioned by reporters at the Group of Seven summit in Paris.

Asked whether the concerns surrounding the relationship had changed his position on negotiations with Beijing over AI, Rubio said the United States would act in its own interests.

“The Chinese system is always going to act in the best interest of the Chinese system, and the United States will always act in the best interest of the United States. I work for the American people,” he said.

For Washington's China hawks, Huang's exit has opened a window to push for a more restrictive approach to technology exports. Whether Congress can translate that opportunity into legislation remains to be seen.

But the struggle over Nvidia's chips has exposed a larger question at the heart of US policy: who gets to influence the president when commercial interests and national security priorities collide?

Huang had spent years making the case that keeping China connected to American technology served Washington's interests.

His opponents believed that argument gave a corporate chief executive too much power over a decision with consequences far beyond the semiconductor industry.

Huang's resignation may have ended his tenure at Nvidia, but its implications extend far beyond the company.

For the China hawks who wanted to weaken his hold over Trump, his exit presents an opportunity to shift the balance of influence in Washington and tighten the screws on China's access to American AI technology.

– Ends